Productivity and the Pandemic : challenges and insights from covid-19 / edited by Philip McCann (Professor of Urban and Regional Economics, University of Sheffield, UK) Tim Vorley (Pro Vice-Chancellor and Dean, Oxford Brookes Business School, Oxford Brookes University, UK).

Contributor(s):

Vorley, Tim

Publication details: UK: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, 2021Description: xxi, 305 pagesISBN:

9781800374614

Subject(s):

DDC classification:

338.06 PRO-

Summary: This book examines how an error in global meta-policy set climate change negotiations on an unproductive course. The decision to base negotiations on the Montreal Protocol and overlook the importance of interests, it argues, institutionalised an approach doomed to fail. By analysing interests, science and norms in the process, and the neglect of ‘interactive minilateralism’, learning was delayed until the more promising Paris Agreement was finally concluded, only to encounter a Trump Presidency, which (ironically) might offer further learning opportunities.

Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)

Holdings
Cover image	Item type	Current library	Home library	Collection	Shelving location	Call number	Materials specified	Vol info	URL	Copy number	Status	Notes	Date due	Barcode	Item holds	Item hold queue priority	Course reserves
	Books	NASSDOC Library				338.06 PRO- (Browse shelf(Opens below))					Available			52089

Browsing NASSDOC Library shelves Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)

Previous								Next
Previous	338.06 CAP-C Capabilities,Innovation And Economic Growth	338.06 FUR-; International input-output analysis	338.06 PRO- Productivity dynamics in emerging and industrialized countries	338.06 PRO- Productivity and the Pandemic :	338.0609485 FAR-I The impact of climate policy on environmental and economic performance :	338.060954 RAS-I Industrial growth and employment: a regional analysis	338.064 BAS-B The black box :	Next

This book examines how an error in global meta-policy set climate change negotiations on an unproductive course. The decision to base negotiations on the Montreal Protocol and overlook the importance of interests, it argues, institutionalised an approach doomed to fail. By analysing interests, science and norms in the process, and the neglect of ‘interactive minilateralism’, learning was delayed until the more promising Paris Agreement was finally concluded, only to encounter a Trump Presidency, which (ironically) might offer further learning opportunities.

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.