Democracy and media Decadence / By John Keane
Language: eng- Publication details: Uk: Cambridge University press, 2013.Description: vii, 255pISBN:- 9781107614574
- Democracy -- Studies -- Role of media
- Mass media -- Political aspects -- Influence on democracy
- Media ethics -- Analysis -- Decadence and challenges
- Journalism -- Social and political aspects -- Ethical decline
- Political communication -- Studies -- Impact of media
- Public opinion -- Influence -- Media’s role in democratic societies
- 302.2309 KEA-D
| Cover image | Item type | Current library | Home library | Collection | Shelving location | Call number | Materials specified | Vol info | URL | Copy number | Status | Notes | Date due | Barcode | Item holds | Item hold queue priority | Course reserves | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Books
|
NASSDOC Library | 302.2309 KEA-D (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | Available | 54534 |
Browsing NASSDOC Library shelves Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
| 302.23087 ROU- The Routledge companion to disability and media / | 302.23089 ALI-M Media and ethnic minorities | 302.2309 ASH- Ashgate Research Companion to Media Geography | 302.2309 KEA-D Democracy and media Decadence / | 302.2309 VIS विश्व मीडिया विमर्श | 302.2309052 COV- The Covid-19 pandemic as a challenge for media and communication studies / | 302.23091724 MED- Media and the global south |
Includes bibliography and index.
Published in 2013 by Cambridge University Press, Democracy and Media Decadence is a scholar’s guide to understanding and explaining these trends, and how best to deal with them. It explains why media decadence is harmful for the democratic body politic and tackles some tough but fateful questions: which forces are chiefly responsible for media decadence? Should we be cheered by the rise of organised leaking of information, or worried by the growth of new forms of digital surveillance, or by the collapse of newspaper business models and the lingering culture of red-blooded journalism, which hunts in packs, its eyes on bad news, egged on by newsroom rules that include titillation, sensationalism and the excessive concentration on personalities? What (if anything) can be done about the new media decadence? Is improved legal regulation our best hope? How effective are media literacy campaigns, or efforts to redefine public service media for the twenty-first century? And, finally, the really discomposing questions: when judged in terms of the principle of free and open communication, does the age of communicative abundance on balance proffer more risk than promise? Are there developing parallels with the early twentieth century, when print journalism and radio and film broadcasting hastened the widespread collapse of parliamentary democracy? Are the media failures of our age the harbingers of profoundly authoritarian trends that might ultimately result in the birth of ‘phantom democracy’ – polities in which governments claim to represent majorities that are artefacts of media, money, organisation and force of arms? If that happened, what, if anything, would be lost? In plain words: why should anybody care about media decadence?
English.
There are no comments on this title.
