reimagining alterity and affinity in anthropology Chua, Liana editor. Mathur, Nayanika editor. text Newyork Bererghahn Books 2018 monographic viii, 251p. Who do “we” anthropologists think “we” are? And how do forms and notions of collective disciplinary identity shape the way we think, write, and do anthropology? This volume explores how the anthropological “we” has been construed, transformed, and deployed across history and the global anthropological landscape. Drawing together both reflections and ethnographic case studies, it interrogates the critical—yet poorly studied—roles played by myriad anthropological “we” ss in generating and influencing anthropological theory, method, and analysis. In the process, new spaces are opened for reimagining who “we” are – and what “we,” and indeed anthropology, could become. edited by Liana Chua and Nayanika Mathur. Includes bibliographical references and index. Ethnology Case studies Group identity Case studies Ethnicity Case studies Other (Philosophy) Case studies 305.8 WHO- 9781785338885 (hardback : alk. paper)